Who is the loser? The boy or the girl?

by **rock_26iin** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:21 pm

How bored are people in Hyderabad?

by **CtrlAltDel** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:13 pm

Arti wrote:
CtrlAltDel wrote:
Habitual Perfectionist wrote:
CtrlAltDel wrote:
Mayavi Morpheus wrote:yeh 'that' kya hai
the Encarta site
Don't tell me that a search for "Encarta" brought him to FHDB.
now that we have typed that word, it would
Yeah... and then CADeshwara will also be available through a google search... and years later, people will think there really was an Indian God with that name!!!

guess what!

a google search for "CADeshwara" throws up a couple of links to 2 FHDB threads!!!!!

by **Arti** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:05 pm

CtrlAltDel wrote:
Arti wrote:
CtrlAltDel wrote:
Habitual Perfectionist wrote:
CtrlAltDel wrote:
Mayavi Morpheus wrote:yeh 'that' kya hai
the Encarta site
Don't tell me that a search for "Encarta" brought him to FHDB.
now that we have typed that word, it would
Yeah... and then CADeshwara will also be available through a google search... and years later, people will think there really was an Indian God with that name!!!
guess what! a google search for "CADeshwara" throws up a couple of links to 2 FHDB threads!!!!!

I trust Google... thing is that today you and I know who CADeshwara is... years from now you'll actually be thought of as a real God :-)

))

by **CtrlAltDel** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:19 pm

Arti wrote:
CtrlAltDel wrote:
Arti wrote:
CtrlAltDel wrote:
Habitual Perfectionist wrote:
CtrlAltDel wrote:
Mayavi Morpheus wrote:yeh 'that' kya hai
the Encarta site
Don't tell me that a search for "Encarta" brought him to FHDB.
now that we have typed that word, it would
Yeah... and then CADeshwara will also be available through a google search... and years later, people will think there really was an Indian God with that name!!!
guess what! a google search for "CADeshwara" throws up a couple of links to 2 FHDB threads!!!!!
I trust Google... thing is that today you and I know who CADeshwara is... years from now you'll actually be thought of as a real God ))

thathaasthu!

by **Arti** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 11:16 pm

CtrlAltDel wrote:thathaasthu!

by **Xeno** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:28 am

Arti wrote:
Tyler Hans wrote:Sorry, I was searching thru google when I came across this message and just felt like writing.

Sorry to ask... but what exactly were you searching for on google that you landed here... on this discussion thread????

by **enriquee** » Sat Feb 26, 2005 12:40 pm

Actually if they dont do anything like........... :wink:

there r no losers!!!!

and it will be better. Its juss a timepass nowadays!!!!

by **Ani** » Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:17 pm

If that relationship was just for fun and flirting...then nobody looses ...If that one was a serious and genuine one then both will be the loosers.

by **Vipareeta** » Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:39 pm

Frankly, I think its the girl who would be the one whos going to lose more. Its because shes the one who gives more to the relationship...every time amking sacrifices, accomodating her man and forgiving all his foolish talk and deeds . shes the one building dreams and trying hard to turn them into a reality , while the man is busy observing and absorbing the other girls as much as he can. Most of the men hardly take time to think of their girlfriends when they're not with them . I do agree that a part of their brain is processing the love thoughts but , I'm pretty sure that they aren't strong anough to put all the other thoughts on hold while the processing is on !! In her is the strength to really love and not be calculative of what she gets out of the relationship , while the man is always thinking of pleasing his family, friends , realtives and all the long list he has !

And when the relationship goes down the drain , its generally the girls dreams that are shattered, its the girls' longing to be with her lover thats cut off. Its all her sacrifices gove in vain . All shes left with is her fond memories of her hearts true love . And shes can never ever forget those loving momemts shes savoured privately in her heart . Those memories are going to be everfresh in the garden of her heart and her soul cries throughout her life , feeling how different life would have been if her lover had worked things right .

LOVE is just LOVE . Nothin else can ever be love . And please do not compare the "hanging out with my bf/gf " syndrome with love when you're replying to the question posed. The question posed here concerns with love and I don't think we necessarily bring this syndrome into this discussion . By the way , theres one quote that I want to share with you all at this moment ...I dunno where I read it , but it goes something like this . ITS A BIT RISKY TO GET MARRIED FOR LOVE , BUT ITS SO INNOCENT THAT GOD CAN'T HELP BUT SMILE UPON THEM .

So, here goes my advice for all those "not-so-bold-enoughs" who are afraid to step back from marraige . You Have Come Almost Halfway In Marraige , Just Be Bold and Take The Step And Experience The Rest Of The Love That Your Marraige To Your Lover Can Bring .

by **puri** » Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:26 pm

Vipareeta wrote:Frankly, I think its the girl who would be the one whos going to lose more. Its because shes the one who gives more to the relationship...every time amking sacrifices, accomodating her man and forgiving all his foolish talk and deeds . shes the one building dreams and trying hard to turn them into a reality , while the man is busy observing and absorbing the other girls as much as he can. Most of the men hardly take time to think of their girlfriends when they're not with them . I do agree that a part of their brain is processing the love thoughts but , I'm pretty sure that they aren't strong anough to put all the other thoughts on hold while the processing is on !! In her is the strength to really love and not be calculative of what she gets out of the relationship , while the man is always thinking of pleasing his family, friends , realtives and all the long list he has !

And when the relationship goes down the drain , its generally the girls dreams that are shattered, its the girls' longing to be with her lover thats cut off. Its all her sacrifices gove in vain . All shes left with is her fond memories of her hearts true love . And shes can never ever forget those loving momemts shes savoured privately in her heart . Those memories are going to be everfresh in the garden of her heart and her soul cries throughout her life , feeling how different life would have been if her lover had worked things right .

LOVE is just LOVE . Nothin else can ever be love . And please do not compare the "hanging out with my bf/gf " syndrome with love when you're replying to the question posed. The question posed here concerns with love and I don't think we necessarily bring this syndrome into this discussion . By the way , theres one quote that I want to share with you all at this moment ...I dunno where I read it , but it goes something like this . ITS A BIT RISKY TO GET MARRIED FOR LOVE , BUT ITS SO INNOCENT THAT GOD CAN'T HELP BUT SMILE UPON THEM .

So, here goes my advice for all those "not-so-bold-enoughs" who are afraid to step back from marraige . You Have Come Almost Halfway In Marraige , Just Be Bold and Take The Step And Experience The Rest Of The Love That Your Marraige To Your Lover Can Bring .

Excuse me, women tend to foget a little faster than men do. men too dream of building their futures with their partners at present, and men also sacrifice for their loves, they too cry if they get dumped it's just that men hide what they truly feel mostly when they are hurt, so in short men are the losers!

but both can be losers on a case to case basis

by **The Jackal** » Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 pm

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I dont get it.Check out the time:

1st Post:Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:39 pm

2nd Post:Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:26 pm

The first post was posted(according to the time) after the second one but looking at the posts,the 1st post is posted before the 2nd one.

by **puri** » Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:42 pm

The Jackal wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I dont get it.Check out the time:

1st Post:Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:39 pm
2nd Post:Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:26 pm

The first post was posted(according to the time) after the second one but looking at the posts,the 1st post is posted before the 2nd one.

me too

but i only replied to his post not looking on the time he posted it

by **SeH** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:15 am

Can anyone provide the stats for the sucide cases due to sick love failures across the world.. hehehehe... We can easily know the losers without any friction b'ween us. How does that sound.

P.S : DONT U ASK ME TO PROVIDE

by **CtrlAltDel** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:42 am

puri wrote:
The Jackal wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I dont get it.Check out the time:

1st Post:Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:39 pm
2nd Post:Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:26 pm

The first post was posted(according to the time) after the second one but looking at the posts,the 1st post is posted before the 2nd one.

me too
but i only replied to his post not looking on the time he posted it

12:39pm is noon. 10:26pm is night...get it? :roll:

by **i_m_a_d(imad)** » Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:12 am

hey pple..i dont think ne 1 is the looser couse if the relation ship breaks due to a grl the guy is upset till he sees a new chick on the block.and in case of the guy the gal hunts for a hunk whoes well hung lol j/k.i dont dont think we are here to discuess whats write and wats wrong sex before marriage is not wrong till its caught.in our culture i am sry to say pple lig to bug and dig in others life and gossip a lot he has a relationship with her u know kinda blah blah blah.why the heLL ARE U INTERSTED IN OTHERS LIFE NOTHING IS WRONG UNTILL U THINK ITS RIGHT.

by **ycr007** » Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:20 am

CtrlAltDel wrote:
puri wrote:
The Jackal wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I dont get it.Check out the time:

1st Post:Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:39 pm
2nd Post:Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:26 pm

The first post was posted(according to the time) after the second one but looking at the posts,the 1st post is posted before the 2nd one.

me too
but i only replied to his post not looking on the time he posted it
12:39pm is noon. 10:26pm is night...get it?